All-Time Pro Stock Tour Driver Rankings by Performance Score (Just for fun!)

October 3rd, 2023

Disclaimer: This is intended entirely for fun, it doesn’t represent a true ranking, it’s not meant to be taken seriously. I created a basic equation model to calculate an “MFS” ranking for a big handful of many of the most prominent/prolific drivers (Multi-Factor Score). Basically: I factored in wins, top-5s, and top-10s in different weighting, to reward both wins, and consistency of different tiers, and then contrasted it to total number of races, to account for sample size effects. PS: This is strictly for Maritime Pro Stock Tour, though I would love to add in MASCAR stats. So, for example, this only accounts for Wayne Smith’s time in Pro Stock Tour sanctioned races.

I may re-visit this, incorporating championship points, average field size raced against, average finishing position, etc. Also, over time of course, many of these numbers would have fluctuated up or down for these drivers, to get to where they fall now.

The simplified Multi-Factor Score (MFS) model:

MFS = (Win% × 0.5) + (Top 5 Ratio × 0.3) + (Top 10 Ratio × 0.2)

The model awards both wins, and consistency with different weightings.

The problem with this model in this format, is that it awards win %, Top 5 Finishes %, and Top 10 Finishes %, but it doesn’t account for number of races. So, Cassius Clark and Ashton Tucker for example would be way up at the top of the rankings. Their statistics are fantastic, but the sample size is much smaller than some other names. To ameliorate this flaw, I introduced a sample size modifier to account for number of races. I took the natural logarithm (ln) of the total number of races and used it as a multiplying factor to slightly adjust the MFS for each driver. This gives more weight to those who have more races under their belt, without overshadowing the other metrics entirely.

The modified formula for the MFS would be:

Modified MFS = MFS × ln(Total Races)


Example:

Cassius Clark

  • Total Races: 24

  • Win % = 8/24×100 = 33.33%

  • Top 5 Ratio = 18/24×100=75%

  • Top 10 Ratio = 18/24×100=75%

MFS = (33.33×0.5) + (75×0.3) + (75×0.2)
MFS = 16.67 + 22.5 + 15
MFS = 54.17

Modified MFS = 54.17×ln⁡(24)
Modified MFS = 54.17×3.1781
Modified MFS = 172.27

The fun stuff!

  1. Cole Butcher: 214.03

  2. Dylan Blenkhorn: 203.22

  3. Wayne Smith: 196.24

  4. Shawn Tucker: 193.77

  5. John Flemming: 181.65

  6. Shawn Turple: 178.57

  7. Cassius Clark: 172.27

  8. Craig Slaunwhite: 158.17

  9. Ashton Tucker: 144.36

  10. Jonathan Hicken: 135.77

  11. Donald Chisholm: 134.47

  12. Gordie Ryan: 134.15

  13. Greg Proude: 118.87

  14. Nicholas Naugle: 112.36

  15. Kent Vincent: 109.82

  16. Lonnie Sommerville 109.51

  17. Jarrett Butcher: 108.74

  18. George Koszkulics: 107.36

  19. Mike MacKenzie: 107.02

  20. Bobby White: 103.34

  21. Darren MacKinnon: 101.61

  22. Russel Smith Jr. 94.91

  23. Dylan Gosbee: 91.52

  24. Dave O’Blenis 86.42

  25. Rollie MacDonald: 75.24

  26. Scott Alexander 63.13

  27. Dan Eddy: 61.8

  28. Robbie MacEwan: 61.03

  29. Cory Hall: 58.36

  30. Kent Livingston: 53.49

  31. Matt Vaughan: 52.89

  32. Chris Hughes: 52.38

  33. Greg Fahey 49.97

  34. Brad Eddy: 47.62

  35. Brad Mann: 46.62

  36. Austin MacDonald: 45.78

  37. Kyle Reid 43.30

  38. Marty Prevost: 39.14

  39. Stacey Clements: 38.63

  40. Daryl Mahar: 35.8

  41. Waylon Farrell 34.85



Extras:

For anyone curious, the top-5 ranking without applying the races run modifier is (for the most part, the overall order is similar):
1. Cassius Clark 54.17
2. Cole Butcher: 46.81
3. Ashton Tucker: 46.088
4. Dylan Blenkhorn: 45.29
5. Wayne Smith: 40.15

Previous
Previous

2023 Dual Touring Series Finale Winner & 250 Specialist: Ashton Tucker (Interview)

Next
Next

Dylan Blenkhorn: A Supernova with a Nebulous Afterglow (Interview)